Abstract

Background: The early diagnosis of psychiatric disorders is critical as it improves the chance of recovery for patients. The aim of this study was to determine gender disparities in psychiatric and mental disorders in adult persons and to examine the validity of the 28-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28; Persian version) in the diagnosis of patients with suspected psychiatric disorders, along with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.


Materials and Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted using cluster random sampling method in three steps. Subjects were screened by GHQ-28 and then evaluated by Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) for diagnosis/classification of mental disorders. Chi-square test and independent t-test were used for statistical analysis. The ROC curve was used to assess cut-off points.


Results: Of the 763 participants (aged 15 and above), 25.8% of responders demonstrated characteristics of psychological distress; the prevalence in males and females were 20.9% and 29.8%, respectively. The common mental disorders in males were anxiety disorder (18.2%), followed by any major depressive disorder (MDD) (17.4. %), and compulsive disorder (10.0%). In females, the common mental disorders were anxiety disorder (23.6%), followed by any MDD (22.7%), compulsive disorder (13.9%), phobia disorder (10.4%) and psychotic disorder (6.1%). ROC analysis showed that 91.7% of suspected persons had a mental disorder as assessed by DSM-IV-TR.


 


Introduction

Screening programs are the key element to monitor and achieve mental health Andrade et al., 2002Blum and Nelson-Mmari, 2004. Caring of people with mental disorders can help improve their well-being Jason B. Luoma et al., 2002. It is estimated that in 2030 mental disorders will become the second leading cause of burden of disease worldwide; thus, the disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) associated with mental disorders is expected to increase. Among mental disorders, depression and anxiety are more the two most prevalent Nock et al., 2010. For mental disorders, co-morbidity is a prognostic factor for some outcomes, according to previous findings Veisani et al., 2017. Indeed, 90% of people who die from suicide have had a diagnosable mental disorder Halvorsen et al., 2011. The prevalence of mental disorders varies in populations due to differences in sampling methods, interview techniques, employed tools and diagnostic classifications Veisani et al., 2017.

Three nationwide studies have been done to estimate the prevalence of mental disorders in Iran in the last decade. Noorbala et al., in 1999, enrolled 35,014 participants in his study; it was reported that the prevalence rate of mental disorders was 20.1%; the lowest prevalence was reported in the Yazd province (1.7%) and the highest prevalence was seen in the Chaharmahal and Bahkhtiari provinces (38.9%) Noorbala A.A and S., 2015. In two other studies, conducted by Mohammadi et al. in 2001 and Rahimi et al. in 2011, the prevalence rates of mental disorders were reported as 17.1% and 23.6%, respectively Mohammadi et al., 2005Rahimi-Movaghar et al., 2014. The reason for the high prevalence was unclear. However, some significant factors included gender (higher prevalence in females) and urban living Mohammadi et al., 2003Noorbala et al., 2004.

The Ilam province (where the present study took place) has one of the highest rates of depression and suicide among the 31 provinces in Iran Taherifard et al., 2013Veisani et al., 2016. In this study, the aim was to determine the efficacy of diagnosis of psychiatric and mental disorders (based on GHQ questionnaire and DSM-IV-TR classification) and if there were any gender differences.

Materials - Methods

Study Design

In this current cross-sectional study, we administered screening and clinical interview tools to evaluate the mental health status of responders. The study was constructed in two separate stages; in the first stage, all participants were evaluated using the GHQ-28 (detailed in supplement) by 20 trained clinical psychologists and in the second stage, suspected responders were evaluated by structured psychiatric interview to diagnose DSM-IVTR mental disorders. This study was undertaken with the approval of the Ethical Committee of the Ilam University of Medical Sciences (code: ir.medilam.rec.1395.135).

Samples

The population of Ilam province, according to statistics provided by the health system, was 623,235 in 2016; 80% of the population live in urban areas. According to initial estimates, 763 subjects or residents (aged 15 years and older) were selected from urban settings. Subjects were enrolled using the clustered random sampling method in three steps. In the first step, the percentage of samples from total samples in each city was determined. In the second step, clusters of geographic regions were selected. In the final step, from each cluster, 2 persons (15 and more year’s age) were selected and enrolled.

Diagnostic Tools and Assessments

The 28-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ–28)

Data were collected from a survey of household assets and from the GHQ-28, and applied in the initial screening of participants. Goldberg and Hillier (since 1979) conducted the GHQ-28 for screening based on four categories (severe depression, distress somatic symptoms, social dysfunction, and anxiety and insomnia). The validity and reliability of the Persian version of the GHQ -28 tool have been approved in Iran by Noorbala et al., in 1999. In Noorbala’s study the sensitivity and specificity for a 6 cut-off score was 84.7% and 93.8%, respectively (Noorbala et al., 1998). In our study, we considered participants who attained a score of 24 or higher as suspect cases. A score of 6 and above represents detection of any mental disorder of the four categories above.

Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR

After the first stage, all contributors who have earned a score of 2 or higher were selected for further screening by DSM-IV-TR in the second stage. At this stage, the prevalence rates for psychiatric disorders, epilepsy, and mental retardation were determined. The reliability and validity indices of the Persian-translated DSM-IV-TR had been previously approved Dodangi et al., 2014.

Statistical Analysis

After data collection and summarization, analysis on the data was performed using STATA software (version 11.2) and SPSS 21. Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test was conducted to explore normality by the Explore procedure in SPSS (Analyze → Descriptive Statistics → Explore → Plots → Normality plots with tests). Chi-square test and independent t-test were used for statistical analyses. The ROC curve was used to verify the cut-off points for psychiatric disorders in the GHQ-28 questionnaire.

Results

In this cross-sectional study, 763 persons (of ages 15 years and above) were screened; for all participants the GHQ-28 questionnaire was advised for evaluation. The Mean±SD age of respondents was 37.90±14.2, with a range from 15 to 88 years ( Table 1 ). The majority of participants were females (423; 55.4%), in the 26-45 age group (373; 48.9%), married persons (579; 75.9%), and unemployed (461; 60.4%). According to educational level, 11.0% were literates, 12.5% were in elementary level, 14.4% were in secondary school, 29.0% had diplomas, and 33.2 had above diploma education.

Table 1.

Our results showed that the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in females was significantly greater than in males (p<0.003) ( Table 1 ). As well, married subjects had a significantly higher prevalence rate of psychiatric disorders when compared with singles (p<0.035). The prevalence of psychiatric disorders was associated significantly with unemployment status of the subjects (p<0.001). For educational background, the prevalence of psychiatric disorders showed differing patterns among the various educational levels of the subjects ( Table 1 ).

The mean score of the GHQ-28 in all respondents for the 28 items was 0.98±0.34 (Min 0.25, Max 2.54). The mean score of the items in suspected persons was 1.41, and in non-suspected persons was 0.75. The frequency and mean score of the items by gender are shown in Table 2 . Overall, 25.8% of responders had a cutoff score of 23 that demonstrated they displayed suspected psychological distress and needed to be further evaluated.

Table 2.

In this study, according to traditional scoring of the Persian GHQ-28 version, we used a cut-off score of 23 to determine suspected patients. The aforementioned cut-off in the ROC corresponded to area under ROC curve of 0.9173 (sensitivity of 91.0% and specificity of 51%) with respect to second evaluation by DSM-IV-TR for mental disorders ( Figure 1 ).

Figure 1.

The suspected cases on sub-scales of GHQ-28 by gender are shown in Table 3 . According to the table, 21.4% of all responders were suspected of somatization (26.2% of females; 15.3% of males) (p<0.001), 20.1% were suspected of anxiety (21.0% of females; 18.8% of males) (p=0.252), 30.3% were suspected of social dysfunction (28.1% of females; 32.9.50% of males) (p=0.087), and 24.8% were suspected of severe depression (24.6% of females; 25.0% of males) (p=0.481).

Table 3.

Table 4 shows the prevalence rates of DSM-IV-TR mental disorders by gender. According to the table, in males the most prevalent mental disorders were: anxiety disorder (18.2%), any major depressive disorder (MDD) (17.4. %), compulsive disorder (10.0%), and phobia disorder (5.0%). In females, the most prevalent mental disorders were: anxiety disorder (23.6%), MDD (22.7%), compulsive disorder (13.9%), phobia disorder (10.4%), and psychotic disorder (6.1%). Among all the mental disorders, anxiety disorder and MDD showed the highest prevalence in males (18.2% and 17.4%, respectively) and in females (23.6% and 22.7%, respectively).

Table 4.

Discussion

In psychiatry, it is important to accurately determine signs of psychiatric disorders in persons so the individuals can be further evaluated and diagnosed through clinical interviews. The GHQ-28 questionnaire and DSM-IV-TR classification of mental disorders were applied in the two-step evaluations of the present study. According to ROC analysis, the traditional cut-off point in the Persian version of the GHQ-28 could specify 91% of suspected persons. Therefore, ROC analysis in our present study verified and supported the validity of the GHQ-28 questionnaire as a screening tool for psychiatric disorders in adults, ages 15 and older.

After the primary evaluation the total rate of suspected psychiatric disorders was 25.8 % and, thus, a secondary evaluation was advised for these cases. In our study, the prevalence rates in males and females were 20.9% and 29.8%, respectively. In similar studies in Iran, the prevalence rate of mental disorders was 21% (14.9% in males; 25.9% in females), as reported by Noorbala et al. Noorbala et al., 1998. Moreover, Mohammadi et al. reported a prevalence rate of 17.1% (10.86% in males; 23.4% in females) Mohammadi et al., 2003, and Rahimi and colleagues reported a prevalence rate of 23% Rahimi-Movaghar et al., 2014.

The higher prevalence of psychiatric disorders in females observed in this study is consistent with other studies. When we evaluated suspected persons for DSM-IV-TR mental disorders, we found that the common mental disorders were MDD, manic disorder and anxiety disorder; moreover, we found that these disorders are more prevalent in females. One explanation for this finding is that females are more prone to stress in similar situations as males Kessler et al., 2005Nolen-Hoeksema, 2001, which may attributable to biological reactions and socio-cultural factors in females Parker and Brotchie, 2010.

Indeed, our results also showed that there is a significant relationship between lower educational level and higher prevalence of psychiatric disorders in responders. Reports in other countries are in accordance with results in this study. The impact of educational level on prevalence of psychiatric disorders has been previously reported Kebede et al., 1999Lin, 1953. Our results also show that unemployment significantly impacts psychiatric disorders, which is consistent with findings observed from a Brazilian study that concluded that unemployed respondents were more likely to have a lifetime (mental) disorder Andrade et al., 2002.

Some limitations of this study are that the diagnostic instrument (summary form of DSM-IV-TR) did not include an assessment of all DSM-IV disorders and that the study was limited to persons of age 15 and above. As the diagnostic validity of the Persian GHQ-28 included only this age group, the results of the present study cannot be generalizable to the whole population.

Conclusion

This study verifies the validity of the Persian version of the GHQ-28 as a screening tool to determine psychiatric disorders in persons of age 15 and above. The GHQ-28 can be a useful instrument to identify individuals with high risk of mental disorders for referral for subsequent interventions.

Abbreviations

AD: Anxiety Disorder

DSM: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

GHQ-28: General Health Questionnaire- 28 Items

MDD: Major Depressive Disorder

ROC: Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis

Author Contribution

Study concept and design and statistical analysis: FM, YV. The interpretation of data results: YV. The drafting of the manuscript: AD. Final revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: YV, FM, AD.

References

  1. L. Andrade, E. E. Walters, V. Gentil, R. Laurenti. Prevalence of ICD-10 mental disorders in a catchment area in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2002; 37(7) : 316-325 .
    View Article    PubMed    Google Scholar 
  2. R. W. Blum, K. Nelson-Mmari. The health of young people in a global context. The Journal of Adolescent Health. 2004; 35(5) : 402-418 .
    View Article    PubMed    Google Scholar 
  3. N. Dodangi, N. Habibi Ashtiani, B. Valadbeigi. Prevalence of DSM-IV TR Psychiatric Disorders in Children and Adolescents of Paveh, a Western City of Iran. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2014; 16(7) : e16743 .
    View Article    PubMed    Google Scholar 
  4. J. A. Halvorsen, R. S. Stern, F. Dalgard, M. Thoresen, E. Bjertness, L. Lien. Suicidal ideation, mental health problems, and social impairment are increased in adolescents with acne: A population-based study. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2011; 131(2) : 363-370 .
    View Article    PubMed    Google Scholar 
  5. J. B. Luoma, C. E. Martin, J. L. Pearson. Contact with mental health and primary care providers before suicide: A review of the evidence. The American Journal of Psychiatry. 2002; 159(6) : 909-916 .
    View Article    PubMed    Google Scholar 
  6. D. Kebede, A. Alem, E. Rashid. The prevalence and socio-demographic correlates of mental distress in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum. 1999; 397 : 5-10 .
  7. R. C. Kessler, P. Berglund, O. Demler, R. Jin, K. R. Merikangas, E. E. Walters. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2005; 62(6) : 593-602 .
    View Article    PubMed    Google Scholar 
  8. T. Lin. A study of the incidence of mental disorder in Chinese and other cultures. Psychiatry. 1953; 16(4) : 313-336 .
    View Article    PubMed    Google Scholar 
  9. M.-R. Mohammadi, H. Davidian, A. A. Noorbala, H. Malekafzali, H. R. Naghavi, H. R. Pouretemad, A. Ghanizadeh. An epidemiological survey of psychiatric disorders in Iran. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health. 2005; 1(1) : 16 .
    View Article    PubMed    Google Scholar 
  10. M.R. Mohammadi, M. Rahgozar, S.A. Bagheri Yazdi, H.R. Naghavi, H.R. Pouretemad, H. Amini, M.R. Rostami, F. Khalajabadi Farahani, B. Mesgarpour. An epidemiological study of psychiatric disorders in Tehran Province. J Andisheh Va Raftar. 2003; 2 .
  11. M. K. Nock, I. Hwang, N. A. Sampson, R. C. Kessler. Mental disorders, comorbidity and suicidal behavior: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Molecular Psychiatry. 2010; 15(8) : 868-876 .
    View Article    PubMed    Google Scholar 
  12. S. Nolen-Hoeksema. Gender Differences in Depression. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2001; 10(5) : 173-176 .
    View Article    Google Scholar 
  13. A. A. Noorbala, S. Akhondzadeh. Mental health study process into prevalence of mental disorders in Iran. Archives of Iranian Medicine. 2015; 18(2) : 74-75 .
    PubMed    Google Scholar 
  14. A. A. Noorbala, S. A. Bagheri Yazdi, M. T. Yasamy, K. Mohammad. Mental health survey of the adult population in Iran. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2004; 184(01) : 70-73 .
    View Article    PubMed    Google Scholar 
  15. A.A. Noorbala, K. Mohammad, S.A. Bagheri Yazdi. The epidemiological study of psychiatric disorders in Tehran. J Hakim. 1998; 4 .
  16. G. Parker, H. Brotchie. Gender differences in depression. International Review of Psychiatry (Abingdon, England). 2010; 22(5) .
    View Article    PubMed    Google Scholar 
  17. A. Rahimi-Movaghar, M. Amin-Esmaeili, V. Sharifi, A. Hajebi, R. Radgoodarzi, M. Hefazi, A. Motevalian. Iranian mental health survey: Design and field proced. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry. 2014; 9(2) : 96-109 .
    PubMed    Google Scholar 
  18. P. Taherifard, A. Delpisheh, R. Shirali, A. Afkhamzadeh, Y. Veisani. Socioeconomic, psychiatric and materiality determinants and risk of postpartum depression in border city of ilam, Western iran. Depression Research and Treatment. 2013; 2013 : 653471 .
    View Article    PubMed    Google Scholar 
  19. Y. Veisani, A. Delpisheh, K. Sayehmiri, G. Moradi, J. Hassanzadeh. Suicide Attempts in Ilam Province, Western Iran, 2010-2014: A Time Trend Study. Journal of Research in Health Sciences. 2016; 16(2) : 64-67 .
    PubMed    Google Scholar 
  20. Y. Veisani, A. Delpisheh, G. Moradi, J. Hassanzadeh, K. Sayehmiri. Inequality in Addiction and Mental Disorders in 6818 Suicide Attempts: Determine of Positive Contribution of Determinants by Decomposition Method. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2017; 46(6) : 796-803 .
    PubMed    Google Scholar 

Comments