Review Open Access Logo

PARP inhibitors in newly diagnosed or recurrent ovarian cancer maintenance therapy: evidence of efficacy and safety from randomized controlled trials

Phan Nguyen Nhu Quynh 1
Phuong Thi Lan Nguyen 1
Ha Thi Nguyen 1
Toi Lam Phung 2
Danielle TuongVy Nguyen 3
Khanh Ngoc Cong Duong 1, 3, * ORCID logo
  1. School of Medicine, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
  2. Health Strategy and Policy Institute, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam
  3. Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Utah, USA
Correspondence to: Khanh Ngoc Cong Duong, School of Medicine, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam; Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Utah, USA. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7152-9476. Email: dnckhanh@medvnu.edu.vn.
Volume & Issue: Vol. 10 No. 12 (2023) | Page No.: 6090-6102 | DOI: 10.15419/bmrat.v10i12.851
Published: 2023-12-31

Online metrics


Statistics from the website

  • Abstract Views: 5795
  • Galley Views: 2731

Statistics from Dimensions

This article is published with open access by BioMedPress. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0) which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. 

Abstract

Objective: This review aimed to systematically synthesize and report the clinical outcomes of poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) for maintenance therapy among ovarian cancer (OC) patients.

Methods: This review was based on the updated PRISMA statement 2020. Eligible studies were identified from PubMed and the Cochrane Library from the database inception to October 7, 2021. Randomized controlled trials reporting the clinical outcomes of PARPis as maintenance therapy for OC were included in this review. The Risk of Bias 2 tool was used for the quality assessment of studies.

Results: Out of 26 studies, 10 were eligible. For patients with newly diagnosed disease, compared with placebo, either olaparib or niraparib considerably prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), with hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49–0.72) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.50–0.76), respectively. Among recurrent patients, olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib also achieved higher PFS than placebo, with HRs of 0.39 (95% CI: 0.27–0.55), 0.32 (95% CI: 0.23–0.45), and 0.35 (95% CI: 0.28–0.45), respectively. Regarding adverse events, patients taking PARPis experienced a higher risk of hematologic events than the placebo group.

Conclusions: PARPis as maintenance therapy were beneficial in PFS improvement for OC patients. However, the considerable risk of hematologic events must be considered when using this treatment class.

Sorry, we can not display full-text of this article in HTML format for you right now. Please get the article in PDF format instead.

Comments