Biomedical Research and Therapy Biomedical Research and Therapy Variations of anterior and posterior division of internal iliac artery: A systematic review and clinical implications Mohammadbaigi Hadis 1 Darvishi Marzieh Darvish-m@medilam.ac.ir 1 2 Moayeri Ardeshir 1 2 Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran Student research committee, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran Abstract

The distribution pattern of internal iliac artery (IIA) implies its bifurcation to two branches, the anterior and the posterior trunks. According to previous research, IIA indicates several anatomical variations. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the types of these variations. The presence of these variations in the arteries is an important topic to urologists, gynecologists, radiologists, and general surgeons because they can be ruptured during surgical procedures in the perineal and pelvis region. Three databases were searched for the period from 1810 to January 2018 and a total of 75 studies were investigated. This study evaluated the branching of the internal iliac artery in several literatures and compared it with Adachi's classification. This finding can lead to improve surgical technique and safety in medical practice.

Keywords Internal iliac artery Pelvic vascularization Umbilical artery classification distribution pattern Keywords Introduction

From an anatomic point of view, internal iliac artery (IIA) begins as a terminal branch of the common iliac artery at the level of sacroiliac joint. Each IIA is around 3.5 cm long, descending near the upper border of greater sciatic foramen and divides into anterior and posterior branches. The ureter, uterine tube and ovary are placed on the anterior surface of the IIA. However, the internal iliac vein and lumbosacral trunk pass from the posterior side of IIA. The branches arising from the anterior and posterior trunks of the IIA are described in Table 1. Anterior trunk distributes to the pelvic viscera and posterior trunk supplies to the body wall and buttocks1,2,3.

<bold id="s-877d3832bf5c">Branches of anterior and posterior trunk of the IIA in different sex of male and female<xref rid="510271:11723205" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>,<xref rid="510271:11723208" ref-type="bibr">3</xref></bold>

Branches of IIA

Male

Female

Anterior trunk of the IIA

Parietal branches

 		Internal pudendal artery internal pudendal artery

Inferior gluteal artery inferior gluteal artery

Obturator artery Obturator artery

Visceral branches

 		Umbilical artery Umbilical artery

Superior vesical artery superior vesical artery

Inferior vesical arterymiddle rectal artery Vaginal artery (replaced by inferior vesical artery)middle rectal artery

uterine artery (only in women)

Posterior trunk of the IIA

Parietal branches

 		Superior gluteal artery Superior gluteal artery
lateral sacral arteries lateral sacral arteries
Iliolumbar artery Iliolumbar artery

During development, this artery derives from the proximal part of umbilical artery that is also called hypogastric artery whereas the distal part of umbilical artery obliterated postnatally 2,4. This embryological development leads to several variations in the origin of IIA and its branching pattern into two major trunks 3. Hence, understanding anatomical variation of IIA is essential for surgeons to apply the IIA ligature to prevent hemorrhages following by pelvic surgeries, hysterectomies and orthopedic surgeries related to hip joint. Previous studies show that the level of origin of IIA is variable and dependent on the length of the common iliac artery and the level of division of IIA 5. Typically, the origin of the IIA is between L5 and the upper border of S1 1,2. When we searched for the anomalies declared on the normal pattern, IIA shows several anatomical variations. There have been studies that describe different forms of IIA in a population or individually. However, we attempted to create a proper classification of these variations, since each author described his own findings as an independent classification. Hence, none of the categories represent the observed variations completely. In this study, we collected recent reports to:

Investigate the variations of anterior division of the IIA.

Examine the variations of posterior division of the IIA.

Update the IIA classification based on recorded data.

The first attempt to classify variant patterns of IIA was performed by Jastschinski that showed four types which he described on an investigation of variant patterns of IIA branches. This classification was based on the four branches that included the inferior gluteal artery, internal pudendal artery, superior gluteal artery and umbilical artery 6.

<bold id="s-08a11f2c0dd7">Materials and Methods</bold> <bold id="strong-2">Research method</bold>

The report of this review study was based on a systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) (7). PUBMED, ISI web of knowledge and SCOPUS were searched for published studies up to January 2018. Three anatomical textbooks (Gray’s Anatomy, SNELL and Netter) were evaluated in order to find any type of evidence in association with IIA. Several key words were used in our search, including “internal iliac artery”, “hypogastric artery”, “arteria iliaca interna”, “anterior division internal iliac artery” and “posterior division internal iliac artery”. To increase the accuracy of the process, two independent researchers carried out writing the papers and evaluating data. The study was evaluated and selected in three stages. In the first step, citation information and a summary of the evaluated papers were transferred to the Endnote software. Then the titles of the selected articles were reviewed and the articles that were not related to the main topic of the research were excluded. In the second stage, from the abstracts, articles related to the main subject were determined. Finally, the original text of the selected articles was assessed.

<bold id="s-0c70a93b2a90">PRISMA diagram of included articles into process.</bold>

<bold id="strong-3">Inclusion and exclusion criteria</bold>

The data included into the study complied with the following criteria:

1) they were consisted of original research, case report and review articles from the anatomical variations of the AII in cadaveric, clinical and imaging sample studies, or those which provided data about variation of the superior vesical artery (SVA), inferior vesical artery (IVA), middle rectal artery (MRA), obturator artery (OA), internal pudendal artery (IPA), inferior gluteal artery (IGA), uterine artery (UtA), vaginal artery (VA), superior gluteal artery (SGA), lateral sacral arteries (LSA) and iliolumbar artery (ILA).

2) Only human studies were selected.

3) There were no restrictions related to the demographic characteristics of the sample study (race, sex, and age).

<bold id="s-354d4cdaebf7">Study selection and data extraction </bold>

The initial electronic and manual search yielded 4398 articles. After extracting all papers, evaluating the titles and removing double and irrelevant articles, 1184 studies were selected. After reviewing the abstracts and their adaptation to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 204 articles related to the subject matter remained. After evaluating the full texts of the articles, 129 articles were disqualified and 75 articles were confirmed and prepared for final analysis. The process of extracting and selecting articles is shown in Figure 1. The required data included the origin of IIA at different levels, distance from greater sciatic foramen and types of IIA, SVA, IVA, MRA, OA, IPA, IGA, UtA, VA, SGA, LSA, ILA, variations (first author’s name, publication year, sample size and mean).

<bold id="s-e33d4b7ca8ab">Results and Discussion</bold> <bold id="s-073cf16eb330">Distribution of the internal iliac artery (IIA)</bold>

According to the older terminology, IIA arises from the common iliac artery at the level of the sacroiliac joint and adjusts with the intervertebral disc between L5 and S1, then descends posteriorly within the pelvic cavity; subsequently, it reaches the greater sciatic foramen 1,2,3,4. Several studies reported the variation in the origin of the IIA (Table 2). The findings of previous studies indicate that the most common anatomical position of the origin of the internal iliac artery is at the level of lumbosacral (L5-S1).

<bold id="s-6e8999c22813">Origin of internal iliac artery (IIA) at different levels </bold>

Study

Ref

Vertebral level

No. of specimen

Percentage

Mamatha (2015) 5 L5-S1 vertebraL5 vertebra 362 72*4
Sakthivelavan (2014) 6 L5-S1 vertebraAbove level 9422 81*19
Havaldar (2014) 7,8 L5-L4 vertebraS1 vertebra 82 164
Naveen (2011) 9 S1 vertebraL5 vertebra 351 58.3*1.7
Fatu (2006) 10 Sacro-iliac joint 100 100*

<bold id="s-958fbcf4d6d1">Distance from greater sciatic foramen</bold>

Study

Ref

Distance

No. of specimen

Percentage
Mamatha H etal. (2015) 5 Above 2 cm Below 1 cm 14 1 282
Havaldar P etal. (2014) 8 Above 0.5cm below the upper border 2 cm 92 18*4
Havaldar P etal. (2014) 11 Above below the upper border 349 68*18
Sakthivelavan S etal. (2014) 6 Upper borderposition between lumbosacral articulation and greater sciatic notch 7940 65.5*34.5
Naveen et al (2011) 9 Above 3 cmAbove 5.5 cm 184 30.7*6.6

The IIA divides at the level of superior edge of greater sciatic notch. Table 3 shows variations in IIA division in the vicinity of the greater sciatic foramen.

In 1928, this classification was introduced by Adachi in Japanese subjects with a slight change 12. He described IIA variations in five types which include:

Type I: The superior gluteal artery and a common trunk arise from IIA. The common trunk is bifurcate and forms the inferior gluteal and internal pudendal arteries. If the common trunk divides into the pelvis, it is type Ia, and if it is outside the pelvis then it’s classified as type Ib.

Type II: The internal pudendal artery and a common trunk arise from IIA. The common trunk is bifurcate and forms the inferior gluteal and superior gluteal arteries. If the common trunk divides into the pelvis, it is of the type IIa, and if it is outside the pelvis then it is classified as type IIb.

Type III: The internal pudendal artery and two gluteal arteries are given off separately from the internal iliac artery.

Type IV: The internal pudendal artery and two gluteal arteries originate from the same trunk. In type IVa, the trunk first gives rise to the superior gluteal artery while in type IVb, the internal pudendal is the first vessel to be separated.

Type V: The inferior gluteal artery and the common trunk arise from IIA. The common trunk is bifurcate and forms the internal pudendal and superior gluteal arteries into the pelvis (Figure 2).

<bold id="s-be0d9b94c632">Adachi’s types of IIA variations</bold>.<bold id="s-12ab9a76a310"> IIA</bold>: internal iliac artery; <bold id="s-ae38db961428">IGA</bold>: Inferiorgluteal artery; <bold id="s-86e0cd3f5444">IPA</bold>: Internal pudendal artery; <bold id="s-3f01aba3a2e9">SGA</bold>: Superior gluteal artery; <bold id="s-47ce7f4412be">UA</bold>:Umbilical artery<xref id="x-f336f5c26e90" rid="510271:11723216" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>.

<bold id="s-0c0cab0fba60">Types of IIA variations according to Adachi classification (%)</bold>

Study

Year

Types of IIA variations according to Adachi classification%

No. of specimen

I

II

III

IV

V

Other
Lipshutz 13 1916 51 24 17 7 - - 181
Adachi 12 1928 51.2 23.1 18.2 4.1 0.8 2.5 121
Tsukamoto 14 1929 56.5 8.4 22 12.9 - - 287
Miyaji 15 1935 70.4 11.7 9.5 8.4 - - 179
Aria 16 1936 52.4 19.4 24 4.2 - - 500
Hoshiai 17 1938 55.1 16.1 26.1 2.6 - - 379
Ashley & Anson 18 1941 58.1 17.3 9.6 7.7 - 7.3 260
Suzuki 19 1951 53.2 18.8 24.1 3.7 0.2 - 490
Braithwaite 20 1952 58.5 15.3 22.5 3.6 - - 169
Yasukawa 21 1954 53.7 18.4 23.9 4 - - 544
Fischer 22 1959 50 26 16 8 - - 50
Roberts & Krishingner 23 1968 50.9 27 14.4 7.2 - 0.6 167
Morita 24 1974 49.1 22.5 21.7 6.7 - - 267
Lwasaki 25 1987 54.2 19.5 24.3 2 - - 251
Yamaki 26 1998 58 13.6 22.8 5.4 0.2 - 645
Sakthivelavan 27 2014 63.2 15.8 21 - - - 116
Talalwah 28 2014 36.1 5.3 34.8 2.3 - - 342
Present study 2018 54.2 17.7 20.7 5.6 0.4 3.46 4948

<bold id="strong-5">Anterior trunk of the IIA</bold> Parietal branches <bold id="strong-6">Internal pudendal artery (IPA)</bold>

The most common origins of the internal pudendal artery (IPA) are a branch that stems from the anterior division of the IIA and is the main vessel of the perineum. However, several articles confirm the variable source for this artery. It is important for anatomists and surgeons to understand of IPA1,3,4,2. The IPA was classified by Kawanishi 29 in the vicinity of the greater sciatic notch, the linea terminalis, and the ischial spine (Table 5,Table 4).

<bold id="s-4ded25f2cbd4">Types of variation the internal pudendal artery (IPA).</bold>

<bold id="s-7daec96f5117">Types of variation the internal pudendal artery (IPA) classified by Kawanishi <xref id="x-0a5f239911fe" rid="510271:11723233" ref-type="bibr">29</xref> </bold>

Types

Variation
1 The IPA originates from the anterior trunk of IIA at the level between the linea terminalis and the greater sciatic foramen
2 The IPA originates from the anterior trunk of the IIA at the level of the distal to greater sciatic foramen
3 The IPA gives off directly from the IIA at a level proximal to the linea terminalis
4 The IPA, superior and inferior gluteal artery originates from anterior trunk within 1 cm of each other
5 The penile artery is other than the IPA, such as the obturator artery

<bold id="strong-8">Inferior gluteal artery (IGA)</bold>

The IGA is the larger terminal branch of the anterior division of IIA and supplies the buttock and thigh. It descends anteriorly to the piriformis muscle and posterior to the IPA 1. It passes between the piriformis and ischiococcygeus muscle. Then IGA runs through the greater sciatic notch to reach the gluteal region. Gabrielli (1997) showed that the IGA branches penetrated the sciatic nerve in 22.5% of cases30. The IGA and IPA arteries often originate as a common stem from the IIA, sometimes with the SGA (Table 6).

<bold id="s-0dc9654729f0">Origin of inferior gluteal artery (IGA) </bold>

Author

Year

Common trunk

Anterior division N (%)

Posterior division N (%)

Absence N (%)
Lipshutz 13 (1916) Common trunk with IPA (40%) - - -
Adachi 12 (1928) Common trunk with IPA (51.2%) - - -
Braithwaite 20 (1952) Common trunk with IPA (60.9%) - - -
Roberts & Krishingner 23 (1968) Common trunk with IPA (56.4) - - -
Bergman 31 (1988) Common trunk with the SGA - - -
Surekha 32 (2012) Case report absence of IGA
Reddy 33 (2007) Case report absence of IGA
Kawanishi 34 (2008) Common trunk with the SGA and IPA - - -
Nayak 35 (2012) - Case report - absence of IGA
Havaldar 8 (2014) - Directly in 11 (22%) with IPA in 24 (48%) with ILA in 1 (2%) with OA in 2 (4%) with LSA in 2 (4%) double IGA in 2 (4%) Directly in 2(4%) with OA in 1 (2%) 5 (10%)
Sakthivelavan 27 (2014) Common trunk with IPA (63.2%) - - -
Narayana 36 (2015) - 40 (97%) 1 (3%)
Talalwah 28 (2015) Common trunk with IPA and OA (1.5%) 37.5% (independently with the IPA) 45.7% (dependently with the IPA) 7.7% 4.6%
Chase & Kirchhoff 37 (2015) Common trunk with IPA (48.3) - - -
Mohamadi 38 (2016) Case report +

<bold id="strong-10">Obturator artery (OA)</bold>

One anther of the branches of the anterior trunk of the IIA is obturator artery (OA). This artery passes through the external walls of the pelvis and the artery reaches obturator foramen and enters the obturator canal. In this way it is divided into the vesical, pubic and acetabular branches also, OA supplies the medial compartment of the thigh 1,3. In order to prevent vascular injury and hemorrhage during surgery of the Bogros space and mesh stapling in inguinal or obturator hernia surgery, it is necessary to identify the variations of OA and their distance and orientation to the femoral ring 39. Several papers presented the aberrant of OA in a cross from the pelvic (Table 6).

<bold id="s-c61f5c0a917a">Origin of obturator artery (OA)</bold>

Origin of obturator artery

Frequencies showed by author in %

Parsons (1897)

Pick (1942)

Braithwaite (1952)

Pushpa (2006)

Kumar

(2007)

Pia (2009)

Havaldar (2014)

Rajive (2015)

Narayana (2015)

Mamatha (2015)

Sonje (2016)

Goke (2016)
Ref. 40 41 20 42 43 44 8 45 36 5 46 47
Common trunk of the IIA - - - - - - - 4 - - - -
ILA 4.9 1.8 3.5 - - 1.04 10 - 2 - - -
Posterior division of IIA - - - - 3.16 7.2 18 10 - 14 10 -
Anterior division of IIA (normal) 68.5 76 75.9 100 - 61.4 40 54 64 66 67.9 -
SGA - - - - - 9.3 - 2 - - - -
IPA - - - - - - 8 2 - - 10.8 -
Inferior epigastric 25 21.3 19.5 - - 14.58 6 22 26 - 2 -
Direct form EIA 1.6 0.9 1.1 - - 5.2 2 4 8 5.1 100 (Case report)
By double origin - - - - - - - - - - -
IGA - - - - - - 6 2 - 4.3 -
IVA - - - - - - 4 - - 8 - -
MRA - - - - - - 2 - - - - -
UA - - - - - - 2 - - - - -
Abnormal (OA) - - - - - - - - - 12 - -
Absent - - - - - - 2 - - - - -

Visceral branches <bold id="strong-11">Uterine artery (UtA)</bold>

Most often, the uterine artery (UtA) is a second or third branch of the anterior division of the IIA. The UtA gives off anterior and posterior arcuate branches which have to anastomose with the ovarian artery. Current literature reportes variant origins for the UtA. These variations were associated with abnormal pregnancy outcome, injury of the artery with ligation or sectioning of the ureter.

Gomez-Jorge (2003) classified the origin of UtA in 4 types 48,49:

Type 1: The UtA began as the first branch (IGA) of the anterior trunk of IIA

Type 2: The UtA began as the second or third branch

Type 3: The UtA began as a trifurcation with other arteries

Type 4: The UtA began as the first branch of the CIA

<bold id="s-7c04bdf30fbc">Origin of uterine artery (UtA) </bold>

Types of variation

Frequencies showed by author in %

Pelage (1999)

Holub (2005)

Obimbo (2010)

lbulescu (2014)

Havalda (2014)

Mohamadi (2016)

Ref. 50 51 52 53 8 38
1 45% 30.8 18.9% 24% 88% -
2 6% 23.4 70.8% 10% 12% -
3 43% 45.6 10.4% 29% - -
4 6% - 0% 37% - +(case report)

Previous studies documented the umbilical artery (UBA) to be a continuation of the IIA. In embryos, the dorsal aorta of the lower limb divided to ventral (UBA) and dorsal (CIA) branches during the development. Then, the UBA unites with the IIA through vessels anastomosis. The UBA arise from any branch of IIA, such as the main trunk of IIA, SGA, IGA and IPA.

<bold id="strong-12">Middle rectal arteries (MRA)</bold>

This artery is the visceral brunch of the anterior division of the IIA which is frequently absent. The MRA also stem from the IGA and or IVA with the common trunk at the anterior division of IIA. The role of the MRA is to provide an arterial supply to the muscle of the mid and lower rectum and the extensive rectal anastomosis. Hence, the function of the MRA may be significant for the provision of collateral blood flow during intestinal embolization. Didio (1986) reported that the MRA originated from the IPA in 40% of the studied cases, IGA in26.7% and IIA in16.8. In addition, the MRA was found in 56.7% of the specimens, bilaterally 36.7% and unilaterally 20% 54. Havaldar (2014) described the origins of MRA in 50 specimens as follows: from anterior division (4%), IPA (64%), IVA (6%), OA (2%), IGA (8%). MRA was absent in 16% of cases. One of the complications of surgery procedures such as Hartmann’s procedure, is acupuncture to the proximal rectum region. During the Hartmann, s procedure superior rectal artery is often damaged which due to atrophy of remaining rectal part 8. Naidoo (2018) reported that the MRA was not at principal for the arterial supply of the proximal rectum. However, this can assist to preserve the rectal arterial supply in the procedure of surgery55.

<bold id="strong-13">Superior vesical artery (SVA)</bold>

According to the anatomical textbook (Gray’s Anatomy), this artery often arises from the anterior division of IIA and UBA, as well as from the OA (4.4%), UtA (9%) and vesicodeferential (9%) (Table 8).

The SVA supplies the fundus of the bladder, ureter, vas deferens and testis, where it forms an anastomosis with the testicular artery. The beginning of the SVA is at the patent portion of the fetal UBA. The study of Levi and Dubreuil-Chambardel (1925) describe that the number of SVA varies from one to five (Table 9). This finding differed from that of older anatomists, who reported SVA having a single branch (56,57).

<bold id="strong-14">Inferior vesical artery (IVA)</bold>

The IVA commonly arises from the anterior division of IIA together with the MRA. IVA may stem from IPA, IGA or together with IPA and SGA (Table 10). According to the authors, the description of the IVA is variable between to genders. In men, it supplies the base of the bladder, prostate, seminal vesicles, vas deferens, and lower ureter. While in women, the UA with its vesical and vaginal branches vascularize upper part of the bladder (1,3).

<bold id="strong-15">The vaginal artery (VA)</bold>

The VA commonly arises against two or three branches that correspond to the IVA in males. They descend to the vagina and supply the vestibular bulb, vesical fundus, and adjacent part of the rectum.

<bold id="s-a6ad5506808d">Origin of Superior vesical artery (SVA)</bold>

Origin of SVA

Author

Parson and keith (1897)

Bergman (1988)
Ref. 40 31
Hypo gastric trunk 75.9 -
Anterior division 15.5 -
IIA 7 -
MRA 2 -
Double 2 -
UtA - 4.4
OA - 9
vesicodeferential - 9

<bold id="strong-16">Posterior trunk of the IIA</bold> <bold id="strong-17">Superior gluteal artery (SGA)</bold>

The largest branch of the posterior division of the IIA is the SGA. This artery passes in the vicinity to the lumbosacral plexus and reaches the large sciatic foramen, which then passes through the foramen and out of the pelvis. In 2015, Cook defined the type of arteries according to the pathway of the SGA and its relationship with the lumbosacral trunk (LST) that include 58:

Type I: The SGA was between the LST and spinal nerve S1 (67.9%)

Type II: the SGA was outside of the LST (20.5%)

Type III: the SGA was between the L4 and L5 (9.8%)

Type IV: the SGA was between the S1 and S2 (1.8%)

<bold id="s-0aad1bc2fcb3">Number of Superior vesical artery</bold>

No. of SVA

Author

Levi (1902)

Dubreuil-Chambardel (1925)
One 10% 9%
Two 70% 74%
Three 12% 9%
Four 8% 6%
Five 8% 2%

<bold id="s-4b32cebefa87">Origin of inferior vesical artery (IVA) and vaginal artery (VA)</bold>

Author

Ref

Origin of IVA or VA

Describe

Bichat (1812) 59 IIA and UBA No distinction between men and women
Kamina (1974, 2014) 60 IIA and UA IVA is a male specific artery
Drake (2015) 60 UA IVA No distinction in womenVA is the equivalent of IVA in men
Moor (2011)Bouchet (1983) 3,60 IVA is only in menIVA is replaced in women with VA
Schunke (2007) 60 IVA is in women
Rouviere (2002) 60 IVA is in two sexes
Netter (1997) 4 IIA IVA is in two sexesVaginal and uterine branch arise from IVA
Bergman (1988) 31 Anterior division (22.4%)Hypo gastric trunk (68.9%) It has anastomosis with UtA in 60-70% of specimen. vaginal artery arises from the UtA, IIA, MRA or SVA
Havaldar (2014) 8 Origin of IVA Anterior division (42%)Double (12%) It correlate with the research of Bergman
VA Anterior division (88%)IPA (12%)

<bold id="s-c7c17085d97c">Number of lateral sacral arteries (LSA)</bold>

Author

Year

Number of LSA%

One

Two

Three

Four

Tonkoff 61 1898 0 98 2 0
Naguib 62 2008 30 48 9 0
Bergman 31 50.9 47.2 0 0
Sadler 63 1990 55 45 0 0
Sharpey 64 1867 26 61.5 11 1.5
Poynter 65 1922 50 42.5 7.5 0
Talalwa 28 2014 77.2 19.8 2.3 0.3
Sakthivelavan 66 2014 32.7 0 0 0
Havaldar 8 2014 24 76 0 0

<bold id="s-6cc5c5e27f9f">Origin of lateral sacral arteries (LSA)</bold>

Origin of LSA

Frequencies showed by author in %

Talalwah 27

Sakthivelavan 27

Bergman 31

Bleich 66

Havaldar 8

Posterior division 79.1 97.3 92.6 5.7% 90
Anterior division 1.0 32.7 7.4 - 4
SGA 16.8 - - - -
IGA 5.4 - - - -
IPA 0.3 - - - -
Persistent sciatic artery 8.8 - - - -
Absence 0.3 - - - -
IIA 3.7 - - 61.4 6

<bold id="s-cb22ea3c3c78">Origin of Iliolumbar artery (ILA)</bold>

Author

ILA from the CIA

ILA from the bifurcation of the CIA

ILA from the main stem of the IIA

ILA from the point of IIA bifurcation

ILA from the posterior division of the IIA

Ref

Chait (1968) X 67
Hare and Holland (1983) X 68
Ebraheim (1997) X 3.7% X 96.3% 69
Chen (1999) X X 70
Mehta (2001) X 71
Yano (2001) X 72
Harrington (2001) X 73
Winters (2002) X 74
Yiming (2002) X 75
Elliot and Smit (2006) X 76
Yoon (2004) X X 76
Heye (2006) X (61%) X 76
Kiray (2006) X 76
Bleich (2007) X (28.3%) X 66
Naguib (2008) X (50%) X (6%) X (44%) 62
Rusu (2010) 8.75% 2.5% 52.5% 3.75% 32.5% 76
Sakthivelavan (2014) ILA (16.4%)No branch before division (43.1%) 27
Mamatha (2015) 6% 5
Narayana (2015) 2% (from OA) 36

<bold id="strong-18">Lateral sacral arteries (LSA)</bold>

Another branch of the posterior trunk of the IIA is the LSA, which is immediately divided into superior and inferior branches after formation. The superior branch passes dorsally to supply the structure of the sacral canal. The inferior branch passes to the ventral surface of piriformis then through the anterior sacral foramen to supply the sacral canal, skin, and muscle over the posterior surface of the sacral region. Several studies show the variation in the origin of the LSA; however, it remains unclear. The current study includes the variability of LSA and its occurrence to provide main anatomical data for radiologists, clinicians and surgeons. In another study, the LSA was found one to four arteries in specimens (1,4) (Table 11,Table 12,Table 13).

<bold id="strong-20">Iliolumbar artery (ILA)</bold>

The ILA arises from the posterior division of IIA. It runs deep to the EIA and crosses between the obturator nerve and the lumbosacral plexus. ILA then runs between the iliacus and the iliac fascia muscles and supplies muscles and bone. Harrington has reported several branches of ILA that includes: The lumbar, spinal and iliac branches 1,3 (Table 14).

 <bold id="strong-22">Conclusion</bold>

Identifying and reviewing the locations, orientations, and anatomical details of the IIA is essential for successful performance of endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TEP), ligation of IIA during acute hemorrhage, ureteral injury and vein laceration. Pelvic surgeries may lead to hemorrhage if branching patterns of the IIA are incorrectly interpreted. Moreover, in women, acquiring information on the pelvic vascularization and anatomic variations is necessary for protecting perineal functionality in the case of blood vessels injury. It is important for surgeons and radiologists to have anatomical information about common variations of the uterine artery because these variations may depend on the procedures used to improve hemostasis. Failure to understand the IIA variations can lead to bleeding and thus endanger the patient’s life, exclusively in the severe complications such as ligation of the external iliac artery, removing the prostate, hernia repair or uterine fibroid.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the contents of this article.

Authors' Contributions

In this study, all authors participated in the various stages of the manuscript editing and approved the final version of manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Student research committee, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran, supported this review article. The authors would like to thank all individuals who have improved their manuscript with their comments.

References Williams P.L. Bannister L.H. Berry M.M. Collins P. Dyson M. Dussek J.E. Gray's anatomy: the anatomical basis of medicine and surgery Churchill Livingstone Edinburgh 1995 1560 SNELL R.S. Clinical anatomy for students 6th edition Lippincott, William & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2000 292 293 Netter F.H. Moore K.L. A.F. Dalley Anatomie medicale: aspects fondamentaux et applications cliniques 2nd De Broeck Paris 1997 349 355 Moore K.L. Dalley A.F. anatomie medicale: aspects fondamentaux et applications cliniques 3 De Broeck Paris 2011 349 355 Mamatha H. Hemalatha B. Vinodini P. Souza S Anatomical Study on the Variations in the Branching Pattern of Internal Iliac Artery Indian J Surg. 2015 77 l 2 S248 S252 10.1007/s12262-012-0785-0 Jastchinski S. Die tyischen verzweigsform der arteria hypogastrica Int Mschr Anat Physiol. 1891 8 111 27 Moher D. Liberati A. Tetzlaff J. Altman D.G. Group P. Group PRISMA Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement PLoS Med 2009 6 7 e1000097 1549-1277 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 19621072 Havaldar P.P. Taz S. Angadi A.V. Saheb S.H. Study of posterior division of internal iliac artery Int J Anat Res. 2014 2 2 375 9 Fatu C. Puişoru M. Fatu I.C. Morphometry of the internal iliac artery in different ethnic groups Ann Anat 2006 188 6 541 6 0940-9602 10.1016/j.aanat.2006.05.016 17140147 Naveen N.S. Morphological Analysis of the Human Internal Iliac Artery in South Indian Population Online J Health Allied Sci 2011 10 1 1 4 0972-5997 Hawaldar P.P. Taz S. Angadi A.V. Saheb S.H. Morphological study of obturator artery Int J Anat Res. 2014 2 2 354 7 Adachi B. Das Arteriensystem der Japaner Maruzen Kyoto 2014 136e142 Suzuki H. The mode of branching of the internal iliac artery in Japanese Jikeikai Ikadaigaku kaibougaku Kyoshitsu Gyosekishu 1951 5 1 49 Yasukawa S. An Anatomical study on the hypogastric artery in Japanese Jikeikai Ikadaigaku kaibougaku Kyoshitsu Gyosekishu 1954 12 1 43 Fisher W. Anatomisch-rontgenologische Untersuchungen uber die Verteilung and Anastomosenbildung der viszeralen and parietalen weiblichen Beckenarterien Geburtsh Gynaek 1959 154 321 40 Roberts W.H. Krishingner G.L. Comparative study of human internal iliac artery based on Adachi classification Anat Rec 1967 158 2 191 6 0003-276X 10.1002/ar.1091580208 6034641 Morita S. Kato S. Sugawara E. Corrosions anatomical studies on the arterial system of the Japanese fetus. VIII. The common iliac arteries and the branches of the internal iliac artery Acta Mat Nippon 1974 49 79 Iwasaki Y. Shoumura S. Ishizaki N. Emura S. Yamahira T. Ito M. [The anatomical study on the branches of the internal iliac artery comparison of the findings with Adachi's classification] Kaibogaku Zasshi 1987 62 6 640 5 0022-7722 3451658 Yamaki K. Saga T. Doi Y. Aida K. Yoshizuka M. A statistical study of the branching of the human internal iliac artery Kurume Med J 1998 45 4 333 40 0023-5679 10.2739/kurumemedj.45.333 9914720 Sakthivelavan S. Aristotle S. Sivanandan A. Sendiladibban S. Felicia Jebakani C. Variability in the branching pattern of the internal iliac artery in Indian population and its clinical importance Anat Res Int 2014 2014 597103 2090-2743 10.1155/2014/597103 25580296 Talalwah W. Al Soames R. Internal iliac artery classification and its clinical significance Rev Arg Anat Clin 2014 6 63e71 Braitwaite J.L. Variations in origin of the parietal branches of the internal iliac artery J Anat 1952 86 4 423 30 0021-8782 12999644 Lipshutz B. A Composite Study of the Hypogastric Artery and its Branches Ann Surg 1918 67 5 584 608 0003-4932 10.1097/00000658-191805000-00012 17863918 Miyaji K. die A. Uber hypogastrica Arbeit Mat Institut Kanazawa 1935 20 85 93 Ashley F.L. Anson B.J. The hypogastric artery in American whites and negroes Am J Phys Anthropol 1941 28 4 381 95 0002-9483 10.1002/ajpa.1330280404 Hoshiai H. Anatomical study on the pelvic arteries in Japanese fetus Acta Mat Nippon. 1938 11 61 72 Arai S. The distribution pattern of the hypogastric artery in Japanese Acta Anat Nippon. 1936 9 81 Tsukamoto N. Studies on the arterial system in pelvic cavity of Japanese Acta Mat Nippon. 1929 2 830 52 Kawanishi Y. Muguruma H. Sugiyama H. Kagawa J. Tanimoto S. Yamanaka M. Kojima K. Numata A. Kishimoto T. Nakanishi R. Kanayama H. Variations of the internal pudendal artery as a congenital contributing factor to age at onset of erectile dysfunction in Japanese bjuinter national 2007 101 581 586 Gabrielli C. Olave E. Sarmento A. Mizusaki C. Prates J.C. Abnormal extrapelvic course of the inferior gluteal artery Surg Radiol Anat 1997 19 3 139 42 0930-1038 10.1007/BF01627962 9381313 Surekha D. Abhinitha P. Total replacement of inferior gluteal artery by a branch of superior gluteal artery int J Anat Var (IJAV) 2012 5 85 86 Narayana A. Padmini M.A. Study of Anamolous Origin Of Gluteal Arteries International Journal Of Current Pharmaceutical 2015 7 6 14 6 Chase J. Kirchhoff C. Variation in the Branching Pattern of the Internal Iliac Artery Fort worth, Tx: university of north texas health science center. http://digitalcommons.hsc.unt.edu/theses/865 2016 Mohamadi Y. Toolee H. Hassanzadeh G. Bilateral Variation of Internal Iliac Artery: A Case Study Anatomical Sciences. 2016 13 3 197 9 Kayalvizhi I. Narayan R.K. Kumar P. Anatomical variations of testicular artery: a review Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2017 76 4 541 50 0015-5659 10.5603/FM.a2017.0035 28394009 Bergman R.A. Thomson S.A. Afifi A.K. Saadesh F.A. Compendium of Human Anatomic Variations Urban & Schwarzenberg, Ba ltimore Munich 1988 84 85 Reddy S. Vollala V.R. Rao M. Absence of inferior gluteal artery: a rare observation Int J Morphol 2007 25 1 95 8 0717-9367 10.4067/S0717-95022007000100012 Nayak S.B. Sirasanagandla S.R. Pamidi N. Jetti R. Variations in the branching pattern of the internal iliac artery in an adult male: a case report Revista Argentina De Anatomia Clinica. 2012 4 1 25 8 Deeba S. Purkayastha S. Darzi A. Zacharakis E. Obturator hernias: A review of the laparoscopic approach J Minim Access Surg 2011 7 4 201 204 Sonje P.D. Vatsalaswamy P. Study of Variations in the Origin of Obturator Artery Indian J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2016 3 4 131 5 10.4103/0972-0820.191494 Goke K. Pires L.A. Leite T.F. Chagas C.A. Rare origin of the obturator artery from the external iliac artery with two obturator veins J Vasc Bras 2016 15 3 250 3 1677-5449 10.1590/1677-5449.005116 29930598 Parsons F.G. Keith A. Sixth Annual Report of the Committee of Collective Investigation of the Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 1895-96 J Anat Physiol 1896 31 Pt 1 31 44 17232229 Pick J.W. Barry J. Anson B.J. Ashley F.L. The origin of obturator artery - a study of 640 body halves Am J Anat 1942 70 2 317 44 0002-9106 10.1002/aja.1000700206 Pushpa M.S. Kulkarni R. Sheshgiri C. Kulkarni R.N. Variations in the branching pattern of internal iliac artery case report J Anat Soc India 2006 55 83 0003-2778 Kumar D. Rath G. Anomalous origin of obturator artery from the internal iliac artery Int J Morphol 2007 25 3 639 41 0717-9367 10.4067/S0717-95022007000300028 Pai M.M. Krishnamurthy A. Prabhu L.V. Pai M.V. Kumar S.A. Hadimani G.A. Variability in the origin of the obturator artery Clinics (S{ã}o Paulo) 2009 64 9 897 901 1807-5932 10.1590/S1807-59322009000900011 19759884 Rajive A.V. Pillay M. A Study of Variations in the Origin of Obturator Artery and its Clinical Significance J Clin Diagn Res 2015 9 8 12 5 2249-782X 26435935 Razavi M.K. Wolanske K.A. Hwang G.L. Sze D.Y. Kee S.T. Dake M.D. Angiographic classification of ovarian artery-to-uterine artery anastomoses: initial observations in uterine fibroid embolization Radiology 2002 224 3 707 12 0033-8419 10.1148/radiol.2243011513 12202703 Gomez-Jorge J. Keyoung A. Levy E.B. Spies J.B. Uterine artery anatomy relevant to uterine leiomyomata embolization Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2003 26 6 522 7 0174-1551 10.1007/s00270-003-2652-7 15061175 Albulescu D. Constantin C. Constantin C. Uterine artery emerging variants - angiographic aspects Curr Health Sci J 2014 40 3 214 6 2067-0656 25729609 Obimbo M.M. Ogeng'o J.A. Saidi H. Variant anatomy of the uterine artery in a Kenyan population Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010 111 1 49 52 0020-7292 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.04.033 20579998 Holub Z. Lukac J. Kliment L. Urbanek S. Variability of the origin of the uterine artery: laparoscopic surgical observation J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2005 31 2 158 63 1341-8076 10.1111/j.1341-8076.2005.00264.x 15771643 Pelage J.P. Le Dref O. Soyer P. Jacob D. Kardache M. Dahan H. Arterial anatomy of the female genital tract: variations and relevance to transcatheter embolization of the uterus AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999 172 4 989 94 0361-803X 10.2214/ajr.172.4.10587133 10587133 DiDio L. Franco C. Schemainda R. Bezerra A.J.C. Morphology of the middle rectal arteries Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 1986 8 4 229 236 Naidoo N. Lazarus L. Singh B. Satyapal K. Clinical relevance of the arterial supply to the proximal rectum Eur J Anat 2018 22 1 67 73 1136-4890 Dubreuil-Chambardel L. Variations in the origin of obturator artery coming from the external iliac artery Masson Paris 1925 Levi G. Observations sur les variations de arteries iliaques (Observations on changes in iliac arteries) Arch Ital Biol 1902 37 489 0003-9829 Cook A.M. Dyet J.F. Percutaneous angioplasty of the superior gluteal artery in the treatment of buttock claudication Clin Radiol 1990 41 1 63 5 0009-9260 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)80937-7 2137056 Bichat X. Traité d'anatomie descriptive Brosson Tome. 1812 IV 294 306 de Treigny O.M. Roumiguie M. Deudon R. de Bonnecaze G. Carfagna L. Chaynes P. Anatomical study of the inferior vesical artery: is it specific to the male sex? Surg Radiol Anat 2017 39 9 961 5 0930-1038 10.1007/s00276-017-1828-9 28229186 Bleich A.T. Rahn D.D. Wieslander C.K. Wai C.Y. Roshanravan S.M. Corton M.M. Posterior division of the internal iliac artery: anatomic variations and clinical applications Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007 197 6 0002-9378 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.063 18060970 Tonkoff W. Die Arterien der Intervertebralganglion und der Cerebrospinalnerven des Menschen Int Mschr Anat Physiol. 1898 15 353 401 Naguib N.N. Nour-Eldin N.E. Hammerstingl R.M. Lehnert T. Floeter J. Zangos S. Three-dimensional reconstructed contrast-enhanced MR angiography for internal iliac artery branch visualization before uterine artery embolization J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008 19 11 1569 75 1051-0443 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.08.012 18824376 Sadler T. Langman's Medical Embryology Williams &amp; Wilkins London, UK 1990 Sharpey W. Thomson A. Cleland J. Quain's Elements of Anatomy Longmans, Green and Co London, UK 1867 418 42 Poynter C. Congenital anomalies of the arteries and veins of the human body of man with bibliography University Studies of the University of Nebraska 1922 9 1 1 106 Yiming A. Baqué P. Rahili A. Mayer J. Braccini A.L. Fontaine A. Anatomical study of the blood supply of the coxal bone: radiological and clinical application Surg Radiol Anat 2002 24 2 81 6 0930-1038 10.1007/s00276-002-0029-2 12197024 Rusu M.C. Cergan R. Motoc A.G. Folescu R. Pop E. Anatomical considerations on the corona mortis Surg Radiol Anat 2010 32 1 17 24 0930-1038 10.1007/s00276-009-0534-7 19636491 Winters H.A. van Harten S.M. van Royen B.J. The iliolumbar artery as the nutrient pedicle for an iliac crest graft: a new technique in reconstruction of the lumbar spine Plast Reconstr Surg 2002 109 1 249 52 0032-1052 10.1097/00006534-200201000-00039 11786821 Chait A. Moltz A. Nelson J.H. The collateral arterial circulation in the pelvis. An angiographic study Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1968 102 2 392 400 0002-9580 10.2214/ajr.102.2.392 5635691 Hare W.S. Holland C.J. Paresis following internal iliac artery embolization Radiology 1983 146 1 47 51 0033-8419 10.1148/radiology.146.1.6849068 6849068 Ebraheim N.A. Lu J. Biyani A. Yang H. Anatomic considerations of the principal nutrient foramen and artery on internal surface of the ilium Surg Radiol Anat 1997 19 4 237 9 0930-1038 10.1007/BF01627864 9381329 Harrington J.F. Far lateral disc excision at L5-S1 complicated by iliolumbar artery incursion: case report Neurosurgery 2001 48 6 1377 9 0148-396X 11383746 Yano O.J. Morrissey N. Eisen L. Faries P.L. Soundararajan K. Wan S. Intentional internal iliac artery occlusion to facilitate endovascular repair of aortoiliac aneurysms J Vasc Surg 2001 34 2 204 11 0741-5214 10.1067/mva.2001.115380 11496269 Mehta M. Veith F.J. Ohki T. Cynamon J. Goldstein K. Suggs W.D. Unilateral and bilateral hypogastric artery interruption during aortoiliac aneurysm repair in 154 patients: a relatively innocuous procedure J Vasc Surg 2001 33 2 27 32 0741-5214 10.1067/mva.2001.111678 11174809 Chen R.S. Liu Y.X. Liu C.B. Hu Y.S. Xu D.C. Zhong S.Z. Anatomic basis of iliac crest flap pedicled on the iliolumbar artery Surg Radiol Anat 1999 21 2 103 7 0930-1038 10.1007/s00276-999-0103-0 10399209